Tel: +33768734502| Email : sales@davidjbanks.co.uk

RISK, QUALITY, NCR & CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
Project Manager control of project risk, quality assurance, non-conformance and corrective action
Yacht refit projects contain technical, commercial, programme, safety, regulatory and interface risks. The Project Manager must identify these risks early, assess their potential effect and ensure that suitable mitigation or response actions are assigned and monitored.
Quality control is not limited to inspecting finished work. It begins with clear specifications, approved procedures, competent personnel, inspection points, test requirements and documented acceptance criteria.
When work does not meet the required specification, drawing, procedure or acceptance standard, the issue should be formally identified and controlled. A Non-Conformance Report, or NCR, provides a structured method of recording the problem, containing its effect, defining the required disposition and preventing unsuitable work from being accepted or hidden.
Corrective action goes beyond repairing the immediate defect. It should address the cause of the problem where appropriate so that recurrence is reduced.
Key responsibilities
A practical qualitative risk assessment normally considers both probability and impact, with impact assessed against objectives such as cost, schedule, quality or performance.
RISK & QUALITY CONTROL CHECK
For the project and each significant work package, the Project Manager should verify, where applicable:
Useful distinctions:
Risk — an uncertain event or condition that may affect project objectives.
Issue — a condition or event that has already occurred and requires action.
Defect — work or material that does not meet the intended requirement.
Non-Conformance — failure to fulfil a specified requirement.
NCR — the formal record used to control and resolve a non-conformance.
Correction — action taken to fix the immediate defect.
Corrective Action — action taken to address the cause of a non-conformance and reduce the likelihood of recurrence.
ISO quality guidance links risk-based thinking with prevention of undesirable outcomes and treats corrective action as part of continual improvement rather than merely repairing the immediate defect.
PROJECT MANAGER COMPETENCY TEST
Scenario 1 — Hidden Defect
A structural repair has been completed, but inspection identifies an unacceptable weld defect. The interior team is scheduled to cover the area later the same day.
Question:
What should the Project Manager do?
A. Allow the area to be closed because the repair is structurally complete
B. Prevent closure, record the non-conformance, coordinate corrective work and obtain the required reinspection before the area becomes inaccessible
C. Photograph the defect and close the area
D. Ask the interior contractor whether they are comfortable proceeding
Correct answer: B
Why:
Non-conforming work must remain controlled until the required corrective action and acceptance process are complete. Closing the area would risk concealing the defect and losing inspection access.
Scenario 2 — Recurring Failure
The same type of coating defect has occurred repeatedly in several areas despite repeated local repairs.
Question:
What should the Project Manager do?
A. Continue repairing each defect individually
B. Investigate the common cause and implement corrective action in addition to repairing the existing defects
C. Increase the inspection frequency only
D. Accept the defects because they are recurring
Correct answer: B
Why:
Repeated defects suggest a systemic cause. Corrective action should address why the problem is recurring, not only repair each individual symptom.
Scenario 3 — Programme Risk
A critical supplier warns that a long-lead component may be delivered three weeks late, but the delay has not yet happened.
Question:
How should this be treated?
A. Ignore it until the delivery date is missed
B. Record it as a project risk, assess probability and impact, assign mitigation actions and monitor it
C. Record it as a closed issue
D. Remove the component from the programme
Correct answer: B
Why:
The event is uncertain but could materially affect project objectives. It should therefore be treated proactively as a risk until it occurs or is no longer relevant. PMI guidance distinguishes project risk as uncertainty that may affect objectives.
Scenario 4 — Unapproved Departure
A subcontractor proposes a repair method that differs from the approved drawing because it is faster and cheaper.
Question:
What should the Project Manager do?
A. Accept the change if the subcontractor is experienced
B. Record the proposed departure and obtain the required technical approval before accepting the alternative method
C. Allow the work and update the drawing afterwards
D. Treat the drawing as guidance only
Correct answer: B
Why:
A departure from approved requirements should be formally assessed and accepted by the appropriate technical authority before it is incorporated into the work.
MODULE COMPLETION
Before completing this module, the Project Manager should be able to: