Tel: +33768734502 | Email: opusprojectmaneger@gmail.com.

OPUS Project Management was developed from more than 25 years of practical experience across yacht construction, refit, repair, warranty, technical recovery and project delivery.
My route into project management was not through a conventional business-school or naval-architecture career path.
It developed through the shipyard.
I learned by working alongside trades, engineers, production teams, subcontractors, surveyors, Captains and Owners’ Representatives, progressively taking responsibility for larger and more complex yacht projects.
That practical foundation remains central to the way I manage projects today.
Understanding how work is actually carried out onboard makes it easier to identify unrealistic programmes, incomplete scopes, technical interfaces, contractor risks and potential delays before they become expensive problems.
Over time, the role developed from technical coordination into full project responsibility covering:
Scope and contractual review
Project planning and Gantt scheduling
Budget and commercial control
Contractor quotations and negotiation
Progress valuation and billing
Variation and change management
Risk and issue management
Class, Flag and technical coordination
Client and Captain communication
Quality control and inspection
Commissioning and sea trials
Project close-out and final reporting
Recent shipyard responsibilities have included yacht projects valued from approximately €800,000 to €6 million, yachts from 40m to 80m, coordination of up to 35 contractors and specialist suppliers, and management of up to seven yacht projects concurrently.
For me, project management is not simply maintaining a programme or producing reports.
It is maintaining control of the complete project.
That means understanding the technical work sufficiently to challenge assumptions, knowing when specialist engineering input is required, understanding the commercial consequences of decisions and ensuring that the Captain, Owner’s Representative, yard and contractors are working from the same information.
A Project Manager does not need to be the specialist engineer for every system onboard.
The responsibility is to ensure that the correct specialist is engaged, the proposed solution is technically appropriate, the commercial and programme consequences are understood and the work is controlled through to testing and acceptance.
Technical decisions and commercial decisions are closely connected during a yacht refit.
Unforeseen work can affect budget, programme, contractor resources and vessel delivery.
My approach is to establish the technical requirement, obtain appropriate solutions and quotations, assess programme impact and present clear options to the client before additional work proceeds.
This can involve balancing:
Cost
Time
Technical risk
Operational requirement
Contractual responsibility
On one major refit, an initial contracted scope of approximately €600,000 developed into a final approved project value of approximately €1.8 million.
The additional work was not simply added to the project.
It was identified, technically assessed, quoted, commercially reviewed, presented for client approval and then controlled through execution and billing.
This is the type of discipline that protects both the client and the project.
My practical project-management experience has also been strengthened through independent study of the PRINCE2 project-management framework.
I do not present myself as PRINCE2 certified.
I have studied the methodology independently and use its governance and control principles to formalise working practices developed over many years in live yacht projects.
These include:
Defined scope and responsibility
Programme baseline and stage control
Risk identification and mitigation
Issue and change control
Quality criteria
Progress monitoring
Decision and approval structure
Project close-out
Lessons learned
The objective is not to impose unnecessary administration.
It is to introduce enough structure to make the project measurable, transparent and controllable.
A large part of successful project management is communication.
Captains and Owners’ Representatives need clear information without unnecessary technical noise.
Shipyards and contractors need decisions, priorities and defined responsibilities.
Specialists need access, information and realistic programme expectations.
Management needs visibility of cost, risk and progress.
The Project Manager sits between these groups and maintains alignment.
That requires technical understanding, commercial judgement, diplomacy and the confidence to raise difficult issues early.
My working principles are straightforward:
Establish the scope clearly.
Build a realistic programme.
Control cost and change.
Identify risk early.
Stay close to the work.
Communicate accurately.
Document decisions.
Verify completion.
Close the project properly.
This approach has been developed through years of practical shipyard experience rather than theory alone.
OPUS supports Owners, Captains, yacht-management companies, shipyards and project teams requiring experienced project leadership across:
Yacht Refit
Technical Management
Owner Representation
Project Recovery
Commissioning & Redelivery
The objective remains the same on every project
The projects below represent selected examples of refit, repair, technical recovery, Class-related works and new-build completion undertaken during my career.
Where required, vessel names and Owner information have been withheld for confidentiality.
The purpose of these examples is not simply to list yachts.
They demonstrate the type of responsibility carried by the Project Manager across:
Scope • Programme • Commercial Control • Technical Coordination • Risk • Contractors • Client Interface • Commissioning • Redelivery
Vessel: 80m heritage steam yacht
Project value: approximately €4 million
Classification: RINA
Project type: Major dry-dock / technical refit
A technically demanding refit involving a historic riveted hull, steam machinery, propulsion, boilers, structural works, deck renewal and extensive Class survey requirements.
Coordinated dry-dock entry and dead-ship vessel movements
Managed hull-thickness testing and structural assessment
Coordinated Class survey requirements and technical inspections
Managed structural and hot-work programmes
Coordinated shaft-line and propulsion inspections
Managed Azipod / thruster-related work packages
Coordinated steam-engine and boiler overhaul works
Managed overboard-valve renewal
Coordinated electrical Megger testing
Managed deck and teak renewal programmes
Maintained programme, contractor and stakeholder coordination
Supported commissioning and sea-trial preparation
Managed progress reporting through redelivery
The project required close coordination between the Owner’s Representative, Captain, Class, yard departments and specialist contractors.
The age and construction of the vessel required careful technical judgement and an approach adapted to heritage construction rather than modern yacht-building assumptions.
Vessel: 70m Benetti
Project type: Major refit / technical recovery
A technically complex project involving investigation and resolution of long-standing propulsion vibration and alignment problems alongside extensive multidisciplinary refit works.
Coordinated technical investigation into propulsion vibration
Managed specialist engineering interfaces
Coordinated alignment and diagnostic works
Managed shipyard and subcontractor interfaces
Maintained programme priorities and corrective actions
Coordinated associated paint, HVAC, tank, electrical and lifting works
Managed Captain / vessel-management communication
Maintained risk and issue visibility
Coordinated technical follow-up through testing and completion
The project required continuous communication between technical specialists, the yacht, shipyard and subcontractors while maintaining progress on the wider refit programme.
Project value: approximately €2 million
Project type: Major technical refit
The yacht entered the yard with an extensive planned work list.
During the refit, additional major technical defects were identified, increasing the scope while reducing the time available before scheduled departure.
Port and starboard stabiliser removal
Stabiliser shaft inspection and replacement
Gearbox and fin works
Investigation of persistent vessel vibration
Flexible-coupling / Centaflex corrective works
Thrust-bearing renewal
Main-engine alignment
Propeller-shaft laser alignment
Class follow-up
Final testing and sea-trial preparation
The revised scope required continuous re-planning, contractor coordination and commercial control.
Additional works were assessed, quoted and incorporated while maintaining the project departure date.
The yacht ultimately departed:
On programme
Within the agreed budget
With works completed to the required standard
The vessel’s Captain subsequently provided a written professional reference confirming that successful delivery would not have been possible without the Project Manager’s contribution.
Project value: approximately €6 million
Project type: Major refit / Class survey
A broad multidisciplinary programme involving structural work, machinery overhaul, paint, electrical works, Class requirements and final commissioning.
Complete exterior repaint
Scaffolding and environmental enclosure
Extraction, heating and spray-zone planning
Mast removal and reinstatement
Navigation-light rewiring
Satellite-navigation upgrades
Structural steel renewal
Shell-plate replacement
Engine-room hot works
Generator removal and replacement
Main-engine overhaul
Watermaker and auxiliary machinery works
Megger testing
LSA works
Renewal / overhaul of 68 overboard valves
Lloyd’s survey requirements
Crane, gangway and swim-ladder works
Commissioning and redelivery
Daily Captain coordination
Programme and Gantt control
Quotation review
Contractor management
Change and supplementary-work control
Progress reporting
Quality inspections
Commissioning coordination
Redelivery
Project type: Long-duration rebuild and completion programme
A multi-year project involving interior completion, exterior finishing, technical works and commissioning preparation.
Managed project coordination between yard and yacht
Supported completion priorities and programme planning
Coordinated specialist subcontractors
Managed technical and production interfaces
Maintained client communication
Assisted with machinery, generator and rudder work packages
Coordinated vessel movements and harbour interfaces
Supported commissioning and sea-trial readiness
Maintained punch-list and completion priorities
The Build Captain subsequently provided a professional reference describing the Project Manager as proactive, approachable, solution-focused and highly respected within the shipyard.
Project value: approximately €4 million
Project type: Warranty / structural defect investigation
A complex technical and legal programme requiring coordination between engineering, naval architecture, surveyors and legal stakeholders.
Structural-plan development
Naval-architect coordination
FEM global and local structural analysis
3D superstructure scanning
Stability-book work
Window-reinforcement methodology
Shaft-line and P-bracket corrective works
Technical evidence preparation
Legal / expert stakeholder meetings
Detailed technical reporting
The role required careful separation between factual technical evidence, engineering opinion, contractual responsibility and legal process.
Project value: approximately €1 million
Technical works included controlled removal of a heavy transom door to access and repair a leaking hydraulic ram.
Heavy-component removal planning
Hydraulic ram repair
Reinstallation and operational testing
Anchor-chain modification
Naval-architect stability assessment
Interior / marble repairs
LSA requirements
Contractor and yard coordination
Captain communication
Final testing
Project value: approximately €800,000
A specialist carbon sailing-yacht programme involving:
Mast removal
Standing-rigging rectification
Keel modification
Conversion from lifting configuration to fixed keel
Ballast optimisation
Weight-reduction programme
Recommissioning and sailing-trial preparation
Approximately one tonne of vessel weight was removed during the optimisation programme.
Project management responsibility has included individual project values ranging from approximately:
with responsibility for:
Contractor quotations
Client quotations
ERP financial management
Progress valuations
Monthly billing
Supplementary works
Variations
Margin monitoring
Cost-to-complete visibility
Final project profitability review
On one refit, the original contracted scope of approximately €600,000 developed to a final approved project value of approximately €1.8 million.
Approximately €1.2 million of supplementary works were identified, technically assessed, commercially developed, presented for approval and controlled through execution during a little over four months.
This was not uncontrolled scope growth.
It was structured change management.
At shipyard level, responsibility has included management of up to:
7 concurrent yacht projects
and coordination of approximately:
35 contractors and specialist suppliers
across multiple disciplines.
This requires continuous prioritisation between:
Programme
Cost
Resources
Technical risk
Client expectations
Yard capacity
Contractor availability
Class requirements
Delivery milestones
Written professional references are available from:
Superyacht Captains
Build Captains
Owner’s Representatives
and other senior marine-industry professionals.
References cover major refit, technical recovery, rebuild and Class-related projects.
Full references and referee contact details are supplied privately where appropriate.
OPUS respects Owner, vessel and contractual confidentiality.
Project names, photographs, technical reports and commercial information are disclosed only where authorised.
Anonymised project descriptions are used where necessary to demonstrate experience without compromising client confidentiality.